Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yannick Maden vs Nikola Ciric Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Maden vs Ciric analysis and find out who is favored!
Yannick Maden vs Nikola Ciric Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Maden 1 - 0 Ciric
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maden has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ciric has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maden, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ciric has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Maden has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ciric has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Maden has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ciric winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Maden has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 196/ 93), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11). Ciric has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 283/ 169), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Maden winning 1 times and Ciric being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Maden winning 2 and Ciric winning 1. The last match between Maden and Ciric was at the Serbia F1, 09-06-2014, Quarterfinals, Clay with Yannick Maden getting the victory 5-7 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Maden and Ciric have played a deciding set 1 times, with Maden winning 1 times and Ciric 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Maden winning 0, and Ciric 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maden has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ciric has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maden has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ciric has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Maden has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ciric has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
784
Rank
96
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
151
High
40
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
61% (339-219)
Career Total W/L
59% (298-209)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$381,245
Career Prize Money
$1,260
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yannick Maden | Nikola Ciric |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-4 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yannick Maden | Nikola Ciric |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Yannick Maden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Malek Jaziri
Player
Yannick Maden
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Moraing
Player
Yannick Maden
40%
(
10 of
25)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Maden
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Yannick Maden
75%
(
76 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Yannick Maden
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Yannick Maden
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Forejtek
Player
Yannick Maden
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
13
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Yannick Maden
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nikola Ciric Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Nikola Ciric
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
32
|
7-6(1) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Ciric
Player
Pietro Rondoni
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nikola Ciric
Player
Enrico Becuzzi
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
6%
(
2 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nikola Ciric
Player
Tudor Sulea
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guillaume Rufin
Player
Nikola Ciric
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
25 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikola Ciric
Player
Calin Manda
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Maden Vs Ciric Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Maden are available here and Ciric photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
